Welcome › Forums › Surnames and Families › Goudie men who moved to Newfoundland from Labrador
Tagged: 1850s to 1880s, Goudie's from Labrador
- This topic has 47 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 1 week ago by
Leslie Switzer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 26, 2026 at 9:38 pm #8061
Leslie Switzer
ParticipantOh, by the way. Do you know anything about the death of your William Goudie’s mother? I can’t find it anywhere. She appears in the 1911 Census and then she just disappears, until her husband remarries by 1921. If I’ve got the right Esther.
July 9, 2026 at 12:51 am #8081Leslie Switzer
ParticipantHi. I’m still working on this. So, Joseph Goudie and Eliza’s John Goudie can’t be brothers. Otherwise, Lily Ann would have married her uncle. There’s probably another John Goudie who was Joseph’s brother, but not the one who married Eliza. Lily Ann married Joseph and Esther Goudie’s son, William. John and Eliza would have been William’s in-laws. Lily Ann’s children are my mother’s first cousins.
I’ve been pouring through the handwritten pages of records and I found that there’s a huge gap in the Twillingate records, from 1853 until 1861, when they pick up again. They’re just missing. Eliza’s sister’s birth record is there from 1861. Her name was Priscilla Coombs. But Eliza’s birth record from 1860 is missing. Now I’m thinking that John Goudie may have been born in the Notre Dame Bay region as well.
He wouldn’t have been born in Pilley’s Island, or the town of Little Bay, because they weren’t communities yet in 1859. Maybe Round Harbour, Twillingate (North or South), Back Harbour, Bayview, Durrell, Exploits, New Bay Head, or Little Bay Islands. I haven’t found him anywhere else, and my family’s DNA simply does not support a Labrador birth. Not from my mom, myself, cousins, and cousins’ children. We all have indigenous DNA, but not enough to originate from the Labrador Goudies, although it looks like Joseph Goudie was from Labrador, but I haven’t found his birth record either. DNA has changed everything for me.
I’ll keep looking. But, for now, that’s how I understand things at this point. I guess we’re second cousins, once removed, even though we didn’t share enough DNA for that to show up. You’d be my mother’s first cousin, twice removed.
July 14, 2026 at 12:13 am #8089Leslie Switzer
Participant*would have married her uncle’s son. Sorry, I don’t think we can edit if we make an error. I’ve made my own post about my family now.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
